- Version
- Download 0
- File Size 1.40 MB
- File Count 1
- Create Date October 19, 2026
- Last Updated October 19, 2026
Resolving Cognitive and Cultural Conflict in Multinational Engineering Teams: A Psychological Perspective on Engineering Management
Multidisciplinary and multinational teams are now a familiar part of the modern engineering environment as globalisation takes hold. While this can lead to greater innovation, creativity, and problem-solving capabilities, it can also result in increased conflict due to cognitive, cultural and organisational differences. This thesis explores conflict in multinational engineering teams from psychological and human resource management (HRM) viewpoints, with particular reference to global engineering projects and the Australian engineering environment. The research aims to understand the sources of conflict, assess the role of HRM practices in managing conflict, and combine psychological theory and HRM approaches into a holistic model.
This research follows an interpretivist paradigm and a secondary qualitative research design using a systematic review of literature, industry reports and engineering project cases. Thematic synthesis was applied to the chosen sources. The results were grouped into six dominant themes: (1) sources of cognitive and cultural conflict, (2) psychological factors that escalate conflict, (3) HRM practices and leadership approaches, (4) case studies of engineering projects in Australia, (5) case studies of engineering projects in the multinational environment, and (6) organisational support. These themes collectively offer a framework for understanding the nature, escalation and management of conflict in engineering projects.
Our findings indicate that conflict in multinational engineering teams is natural, but not always damaging. Task conflict, when managed properly, can lead to creative outcomes and better decision-making, but unresolved task conflict may escalate into relationship-based and process-based conflict, which can harm team dynamics and project success. Psychological factors including emotion regulation, cognitive bias, and social identity were identified as key factors in shaping the outcomes of conflict. As well, HRM, leadership and organisational support mechanisms were demonstrated to play an important role in de-escalating conflict and fostering cooperation. Case studies also demonstrate the difficulties of cultural integration and Aboriginal engagement for Australian projects such as Sydney Metro and Western Australian mining.
This doctoral thesis makes theoretical and practical contributions via the Integrated Conflict Management Framework (ICMF), which draws on psychological processes, HRM practices and organisational support systems to enhance conflict resolution in multicultural engineering industries. It demonstrates that conflict should not be viewed solely as a negative factor but as an opportunity for learning, adaptation, and innovation through culturally responsive leadership, psychologically informed practices, and organisational support systems.